… and now for some equations: An interactive course on diffusion MRI
BY TOMMY BOSHKOVSKI, JENNIFER CAMPBELL, G. BRUCE PIKE, AND NIKOLA STIKOV
WITH ELS FIEREMANS, KARLA MILLER, ALEXANDER LEEMANS, MAXIME DESCOTEAUX, ILEANA JELESCU, DANIEL ALEXANDER, DEREK JONES, AND JOHN TANNER
In two previous blog posts (Diffusion without equations Parts I and II), we described the basics of diffusion MRI qualitatively. We have now developed a larger course for MR scientists interested in an introduction to diffusion MRI. The course consists of six lectures (plus one bonus lecture) taken from various educational sessions held at ISMRM meetings around the world. The course was put together in collaboration with the ISMRM Education Committee, and you can watch it in its entirety below.
Diffusion MRI spans a great amount of territory, from large-scale neuronal connectivity (tractography) to detailed description of neuronal microstructure, tumor microstructure, and more. This course covers the methodology used for these applications, as well as acquisition and pre-processing of diffusion MRI data.
Historically, the development of the methodology used for tractography and microstructure has been somewhat separate, and at the most recent ISMRM annual meeting in Honolulu, the diffusion study group was described as an uneasy marriage between tractography and microstructure. We would contend that it is a marriage that keeps getting better and better, with the spouses increasingly combining their strengths to perform analysis such as microstructure informed tractography. Let us propose that Els Fieremans, Karla Miller, Alexander Leemans, Maxime Descoteaux, Ileana Jelescu, and Daniel Alexander, together with many other contributors to this field, have been valuable marriage counselors. Let’s hear what they have to say!
«
Prev
1
/
1
Next
»
Introduction to Diffusion MRI, Els Fieremans
What is Your Sequence, Karla Miller
Analysis Pipelines for Diffusion MRI Data: From Voxels to Connectomes, Alexander Leemans
Diffusion Tractography: Principles & Methods, Maxime Descoteaux
Analysis: Tissue & Signal Models, Ileana Jelescu
Basics of Diffusion Modeling: Signal Models Versus Biophysical Models, Daniel C. Alexander
«
Prev
1
/
1
Next
»
Do you think you already know this stuff? Then try the interactive quiz below! The questions also serve as course annotations, so casual readers can find out which topics are addressed in the course. Clicking on the question will take you to the exact video location where the topic is discussed. Or you can just try to answer without watching the video, and see if you got it right.
How does the time between the second and the third 90° radiofequency (RF) pulses in a stimulated echo sequence affect the diffusion time dependent contrast?
How does the size of a tract passing close to the grey matter or the ventricles determine the extent of the confound caused by partial voluming, for statistics computed for the entire tract volume?
Which of the following parameters are estimated by the AxCaliber model, but not by the Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging (NODDI) model?
Rank the models in ascending order, with respect to their complexity (number of parameters):
Correct!Wrong!
Now that you are done, we would love to get your feedback! Feel free to discuss the current questions in the comments section, or even better, contribute new ones! It doesn’t matter whether you are an expert or a novice, your knowledge (or lack thereof) could contribute to a fun experiment in crowdsourcing MR educational content. Our aim is to explore new ways to educate MR scientists. If successful, this kind of course structure may be considered for CME credit in the future.
P.S. For a historical perspective on the field, we highly recommend the interview that Derek Jones conducted with John Tanner for last year’s edition of the MRM Highlights magazine.